Saturday, April 26, 2008

Saul as Adam, David as Christ

"For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous." -Romans 5:19


When the people of Israel demanded a king, they got one. And because of Saul the people added to their sins. Samuel says this in 1 Sam. 12:19, "Pray for you servants to the LORD your God, that we may not die, for we have added to all our sins this evil, to ask for ourselves a king." Nevertheless God was faithful. Verse 22 says, "For the LORD will not forsake His people, for His great name's sake, because it has pleased the LORD to make you a people for Himself." Despite this Saul's disobedience did not end there. Saul acted rashly on several occasions, blatantly defying the commands of the Lord. In chapter 14 of 1 Samuel, Saul makes a vow that the people of Israel will not eat until Saul had vengeance on the Philistines. The Israelites had victory over the Philistines, but were so hungry that they slaughtered and began eating the Philistine livestock with the blood in opposition to the law. Verse 33: "Behold the people are sinning against the LORD by eating with the blood." Saul's disobedience caused many to sin.

But while Saul was disobedient, David was obedient. When God called David to fight Goliath he did and ascribed all of his power and victory to the Lord, resting on the Lord's faithfulness, not his own ambitions.

When David delivered Israel the first time it was in a way that none would have anticipated. A boy, a sling, and five stones. When Christ delivered us, He did it without military might or supernatural force. He did it with a humble death in the most despicable of circumstances. How many expected that?

"Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
as in obeying the voice of the LORD?
Behold, to obey is better tan sacrifice,
and to listen than the fat of rams." -1 Samuel 15:22

Friday, April 25, 2008

An Important Conversation

Last fall I attended the 2007 Desiring God National Conference. Twice over the weekend the speakers sat down and answered questions that were immediately relevant to the theme of the conference, Stand: A Call for the Endurance of the Saints. It was a time marked by transparency and humility and had an immense impact on the way that I view ministry.

Below is a clip from the first of the two conversations. John Piper and John MacArthur answered questions from Justin Taylor. You can also view both conversations in their entirety as well as the rest of the sessions at desiringGod.org.



You will notice that there is nothing earth-shattering about what either man said. However, they were, and still are, faithful to the fundamental principles of Scripture and God has grown their ministries. It is encouraging to my heart to hear faithful servants attribute their success in ministry, not to a magic formula that they applied to their situation or to doing all the right things, but to the faithfulness of God.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

New ESV Study Bible


There is a new ESV Study Bible coming out in October. Take a look at it.

I also wanted to compile some resources related to the English Standard Version. They have been helpful in making the case for the ESV in my mind.

  1. ESV.org
  2. John Piper: Good English with Mimimal Translation
  3. Mark Driscoll: Pastoral Reflections on Bible Translations
  4. Ligonier Ministries: About the English Standard Version Translation
  5. Endorsements for the Reformation Study Bible (ESV)


Friday, March 14, 2008

For My Future Wife: 2 Samuel 12:1-15

My roots are weak,
The soil is dry,
To speak of this
Shows how I

Wander about,
My eyes too low,
Longing for blaze,
Settling for glow.

Oh! the day
Unbridled be
Together, yet no
Forgone purity.

I took a lamb
From the poor,
My company
I slay it for.

There is a man
Who does the same,
I revile him
And curse his name.

In my folly
I scorned the Lord,
In spite of this
Out He poured

Means of grace,
Human means.
From shadows,
And night it gleans

New life. Grace,
A lamp well lit
Ignores me painted
A hypocrite.

A heart like David’s
Depraved and flawed,
Needs a Nathan
To seek after God.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Rule Over Me

Dear Jesus,

Rule over me. Rule over my heart, my soul, and my mind. Rule over the words that I speak. Rule over the papers that I write. Rule over the blogs that I type. Rule over my school and my work. Rule over the car that I drive, the horn that I honk, and the gestures that I make. Rule over what my eyes see. Rule over the television I watch. Rule over my web browser. Rule over my mouse clicks. Rule over my Facebook profile, my Google homepage, and my email account. Rule over what my ears hear. Rule over the music I listen to. Rule over the conversations I engage in. Rule over the food that I eat. Rule over the drink that I drink. Rule over what my hands touch. Rule over my day. Rule over my night.

I pray that I would worship you, and you alone, as King.

Amen.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Chirst-Exalting Poetry

I believe that God is exalted in art. It is a gift from Him and should be given back to Him. Art is essentially worship and is a great way to express the glory that has been revealed to us. I would challenge you to not view art as a waste of time. Many of us live in a very goal-oriented environment where only practical, result-driven activities consume our day. Lay them aside for a few moments and pursue the Lord through Christ-exalting art in your life.

Here's a place to start. I found this poem posted on the Desiring God blog. It's called Luke 18.25. Enjoy it. I believe God is glorified in it.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Christian Bookstores

Once every 4-6 months I build up enough patience to venture into a Christian Bookstore. And it takes approximately 7.4 minutes for me to lose all of the patience that I had accumulated. Why you ask? Heed the following observations/ frustrations/ questions/ warnings.

  1. Christian Bookstores are petri dishes of false humility. Every 4-6 months when I walk into one I feel like I see an exponentially greater number of faces slapped on book covers. I'm not talking about a postage size stamp picture on the back next to the author's bio, I'm talking about massive, airbrushed, well-positioned, self-exalting pictures. Consider for a minute why, when (or should I say if) their message is Christ, an author would feel that it is necessary to plant their mug on the cover of their book.
  2. Christian Bookstores celebrate celebrity as much as the world. There are whole sections of books that dedicated to athletes, presidents, and their wives. Do these people have something spiritual to say to us? Maybe. I won't say that they never do. But the pressures of being the first lady or Brett Favre's wife pale in comparison to the single mom raising three children one of which has down syndrome. Does that mom need to hear about a celebrity's climb to the top or does she need to hear about Jesus Christ?
  3. Be wary of books with "you" as the subject in the title. Why? It's not about you. Get over it.
  4. Christian Bookstores are full of conspiracy. Russia wasn't Babylon. Iraq is looking less and less like it is Babylon. Why are we so worried that Iran is going to turn out to be Babylon? I know Ahmadinejad is sympathetic with Islamic extremism and is down with bringing about the apocalypse as he sees it, but do we need to devote a whole section to this at the Christian book store? Besides we have no need to live in fear of this. Jesus is coming back. He will take care of it. Don't be afraid.
  5. Where are all the books by the faithful servants that went before us? I can't find any books by men like Charles Spurgeon or Jonathan Edwards. This baffles me. These men served Christ faithfully and lived lives worthy of their calling. Why are we abandoning their work?
  6. Christian Bookstores like to be trendy. Trendy can be fun. You can have a nice up-to-date cover on your book or a cool modern art piece with a Bible verse on it. But how about we steer clear of letting it seep into our content, shall we? I am shocked by Teen Magazine Bibles or whatever they're called. What the heck. It looks like a magazine and has a new testament in it plus a bunch of garbage articles like "how to get a Christian boy." What is that? It's pretty hard to justify tying in an article about getting Christian boys with the book of Acts. Just don't do it.

Probably what frustrates me the most is that I see very little difference between a secular book store and a Christian one. Disagree if you like, but Christianity is about following Christ, not reading watered-down, self-enhancement manuals that mention God in a few out-of-context Bible verses. So let's follow Christ and not the Christian Bookstore trend.

Friday, February 22, 2008

You Decide 2008: Mars Hill Candidates

Rob Bell
Mars Hill Bible Church
Grandville, Michigan


Bell is the founder of Mars Hill Bible Church in Grandville, Michigan. He is also a well know author, speaker and developed the widespread NOOMA video epidemic. He has been coined the "next Billy Graham" by the Chicago Sun Times and cracked the top 10 of TheChurchReport.com's "Top 50 Most Influential Christians in America." Bell obtained an undergraduate degree from Wheaton college, and upon realizing that he had the ability to teach, enrolled in Fuller Theological Seminary and graduated with a Masters in Divinity.

Bell's theology tastes a lot like little open theism as indicated by Greg Gilbert's review of the latest NOOMA video. The Mars Hill homepage states their theology like this: "When we begin to describe what we believe about God, we discover that he's been writing a story of hope and redemption for all the world, and we have a role to play in this story." In response, I prefer to agree with Scripture which portrays God as an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent being that doesn't require my help "writing" a story. The story is written. And it's about God and His glory.

These stances are not surprising in the least. Bell has been wishy-washy at best when it comes to the authority of Scripture and Sola Scriptura. He also calls into question the virgin birth of Christ in his book Velvet Elvis. Immediately this seems harmless enough, but when one takes a closer look one sees the tremendous impact and follies of this poorly thought out hypothetical. If Christ were the Son of a man, not conceived of the Holy Spirit, he would have been born into sin therefore making a perfect life impossible and ultimately left Christ's death ineffective and unable to justify anyone or anything. This does not bode well for redemption. At least he is consistent. If he questions the authority of Scripture then by all means question the virgin birth. And in a theology where the virgin birth is irrelevant it is probably true that God does need us to help out in "writing a story of hope and redemption for all the world."


Mark Driscoll
Mars Hill Chruch
Seattle, Washington

Driscoll is the co-founder of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, Washington. He also co-founded the Acts 29 Network and is a major contributor to the missonal resource website, The Resurgence. He graduated from Washington State with a degree in communications and is continuing his education at Western Seminary in Portland. Driscoll has been characterized as a new kind of fundamentalist and a maverick. Personally, he refers to himself as a "charismatic Calvinist." He received criticism in 2006 from friend and mentor John Piper. Joshua Harris recounts this in his blog: "As if he (Piper) were speaking to Mark, he said (and I paraphrase), 'A pastor cannot be clever and show Christ as glorious. Mark Driscoll, you’re clever. You have an amazing ability to turn a phrase and make statements that draw people back week after week. But it’s dangerous. So many pastors will see you and try to imitate you and then try to watch all the movies and TV shows so they can try to be like you.' In essence, Piper was bringing correction to certain aspects of Driscoll’s style and delivery, while stating that they agreed on the most important issues of doctrine."

Driscoll's theology is essentially Reformed. He has called himself a 4 1/2 point Calvinist. Very early in his career Driscoll associated himself with the emergent movement; however, he has become a major voice against the camp which is inhabited by influential evangelical thinkers like Brian McLaren, Doug Pagitt, Tony Jones, and, his Michigan Mars Hill friend, Rob Bell.

What separates Driscoll from Bell? First, the authority of Scripture. Bell wavers while Driscoll is unwavering. Scripture is uncompromised at Mars Hill Seattle through exegetical preaching while Bell shows us that he is not so sure in Velvet Elvis. Secondly, Jesus. Driscoll emphasizes Christ as risen Lord, ruling over all of creation, sovereign and unchangeable, perfect in life, glorified in death, and in his resurrection reigning from His seat at the Father's right hand. Bell emphasizes Jesus and his life on earth and the mission that He had. According to Bell, Jesus came to spread love and invoke a redemptive process by jump starting efforts to bring His kingdom to earth.

Both of these gentlemen have "effective" ministries; both have an impact in their communities and are doing wonderful things in their respective cities. Both of these men are my brothers in Christ. However, are both men preaching Christ and him crucified? That's an important question to ask and the question I will leave you with.

Friday, October 26, 2007

Gospel Fresh

I wake up to NPR, therefore I have no business discussing anything that I think I heard because my brain takes a good while to sharpen up in the morning. Not to mention I never hear an interview all the way through since I am constantly reaching over to smack the snooze button. However, I caught something this morning that I piqued my interest.

The hosts of the particular shows were making a transition, one show to the next. They were briefly discussing the interview that had just concluded; an interview that had lots of religious conversation. The host that had performed the interview said something very interesting to me. She stated that the interviewee had a "fresh perspective" on religious issues.

Now, I don't entirely know what that means in the context of the interview, but I do know that I have been hearing that statement a lot lately concerning religious issues. Churches are claiming to take a "fresh" look at the Bible. My parents church has a service called "fresh blend (as if the service was a cup of coffee. What ever happened to first service and second service anyway?)." Bringing an Eastern influence into your Western religious experience seems to be something "fresh."

I guess that my question is this: what is our motivation behind making something appear fresh? If we, as Christians, attempt to take a "fresh" look at the Bible are we really taking a "fresh" look at the Bible? Is the Gospel not fresh enough? God became man, an yet was still God, came to the Earth that He spoke into existence, lived for the majority of His life as a carpenter, ministered for a few years, all while never committing sin. Then, in the greatest act of love in the history of the World, died so that those who the Father had given Him could live with Him forever sharing in His glory for all of eternity. Not to mention the death that took Him could not hold Him and is now reigning at the right hand of the Father and will be seated there forever upon forever.

If you think that needs to be "fresher," by all means add to it. As for me, I will rest in the freshness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Understanding Little Understanding

There are so many things that I do not understand; so many things leave me puzzling for hours. And when my mind is battered and bruised I am only inclined to one response.

The paradoxes that exist within Christianity are indeed immense. And I use the word “paradox” not in a way that questions the legitimacy of the truth that has been revealed to me, but rather as a word, if speaking about anything other than these deep truths (with the Word of God as my canon), would seem borderline ridiculous. And yet these paradoxes occur intensely and without end it seems. I will elaborate.

I am fascinated to continue to find that God is large. He encompasses all that is. He is completely sovereign over all creation (Isaiah 45:9, 46:8-11, Psalm 115:3, 135:6, Romans 9:18-24). He foreordained all that there has been, is, and ever will be (Jeremiah 1:5, John 10:14, Acts 2:23, Romans 8:29-30, Ephesians 2:8-9). He is in and of Himself all-sufficient. He is majestic and powerful. He is just and the justifier (Romans 3:26). He is everything that is beautiful. He cannot be contained or manipulated or changed or brought to an end. He is everlasting (Isaiah 9:6, Psalm 90:2). He controls the furthermost galaxies down to every neutron orbiting around a nucleus that exists at every time since time began. He is the sustainer of all things. He is all-knowing (Psalm 139), completely supreme (I Chronicles 29:11-12), all- powerful (Psalm 62:11), and good in all He does (Psalm 52:1). And He is, most importantly, all that we are not, and that is Holy, Holy, Holy (Isaiah 6:3-5, I John 1:5, Revelation 15:4). God indeed is God.

And yet this supreme Deity has called on us to partake with Him in His infinite Glory! Why? Do you see the divine paradox? God loves us and has called us to be with Him and share in his Glory. But a God who is bound by nothing, limited to nothing, infinite in everyway, calls His lowly creation, made disgusting by sin, to be blanketed by the righteousness of His Son who was sent into the world to suffer and serve that those whom His Father had given Him might be saved. Why? This is inconceivable. We know that God’s Glory is not contingent on His creature. Jesus tells us in John 8 that the Father seeks His own Glory. And we know that Jesus’ witness is true because only a few lines later He says, “Before Abraham was, I am.” Jesus was with the Father from before time and He is God. He claims it right here. Moses saw the burning bush and asked who was sending him and God’s reply was “I am who I am.” And if we believe that the incomplete list in the previous paragraph is true and that God is indeed all of those things, than we must believe that God’s Glory is maximized at all times. His Glory is completely contained within Himself. And yet He wants to share it with His people (John 17:22, Romans 8:30). God indeed is love.

As those chosen by the Father, given to Christ, how are we to respond to this? Recently this has been what I have found: We are to strive. But we are not to strive blindly and without purpose, but rather to enter God’s rest as the author speaks of in Hebrews 4. Here is the only place that we can truly find peace and understand the love that God has bestowed upon us through the saving power of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. And I administer this warning: emphasis on God being God or God being Love without the desire to understand the other amazing side of His person is ludicrous. In Him, God has made us to lean to one side or to the other, but if He has positioned us on the left we must strive all the more to enter the rest of the Father through the narrow gate of Jesus Christ that we may know the right and become balanced. True understanding that God is God will drive us to want to understand His love and experience His attributes firsthand. Just as true understanding that God is Love should drive us to want to know God’s infiniteness even more so that His love may become incorruptible in our minds.

But how is this attained? Back to rest. All we can do is pray that God will grant us the proper response. Seeking Christ is all we can do and that requires resting in Him. Hebrews 4 also says “strive to enter that rest.” What does that mean? Simply that the rest of Christ is what we desire. We do not rest in worldly things, but in Christ alone. That is much easier said than done and that is why the command is to strive.

God is God; we are not. Rest in that. God is Love; He delights in the welfare of His people. Rest in that.